About

01 // Background

I lead the design of decision systems and applied AI inside scientific organizations. The day job is Associate Director of Data Science & Product Management at Montai Therapeutics. The training is a PhD in multi-omics analysis.

The path from bench science to product wasn’t planned. The transferable skill turned out to be designing decision systems under uncertainty — figuring out what counts as evidence, which experiment is worth the cost, and how to keep a team’s confidence calibrated when truth comes back late or partial. PhD work taught those moves; drug discovery ML uses them every day.

02 // What carries over

The questions changed. Which model architecture balances precision vs. recall for this drug target? replaced Which experimental condition will produce the cleanest signal? The decision-making register stayed the same: first-principles framing of what counts as evidence, explicit tradeoffs, and a strong allergy to metric theater.

A pattern I keep noticing in data and AI leadership: people tend to be strong on product intuition or technical depth, with leadership glued in afterward. The hybrid — product judgment, technical depth, and research training in the same person — is rarer than it should be. It’s where I do my best work.

03 // What this looks like in practice

I write about decision intelligence, evaluation under uncertainty, and how scientific organizations actually adopt AI. I publish skills, playbooks, and field notes from the workflows I actually use, with the goal of keeping the system that runs my work in the open — so the next session opens on something that already worked.

If any of that resonates, LinkedIn and the Advisory page are good places to keep going.